The Moothan, Guptan, Mannadiar and Tharakan communities
The Moothans are a trading or Vaishya community, migrants from the Tamilakam of yore, comprising broadly, the Moothan, Mannadiyars, Guptans, and the Tharakan subgroups. A decade ago, a classmate of mine, Mr Aravindakshan, provided me the gist of a legend connected to the arrival of the Moothans at Cheranadu, after having to depart Cholamandalam, in a huff. It was quite an interesting story, but after I found more details in the copy of an old book, I decided to narrate the details here, for there could be broader interest in this community and their links to the Tamil trading world.
Whenever I hear about
Mannadiyars, I remember our landlord at Koduvayur. My father, a doctor of
medicine, spent a while practicing in Koduvayur and we lived in a leased home belonging
to a prominent Mannadiyar. As it so happened,
he also owned a provision store, which we visited often or hung around, while
waiting for the school bus. I cannot help but remember the dark-complexioned,
potbellied Mannadiyar at the cash counter, his peculiar Tamil Malayalam accent,
his calling us children ‘appey’, and the two assistants who handled matters at
the bustling shop, how they packed provisions in newspaper cones, how they
doled out small amounts oil into bottles and so on, so also the smell of the
shop – a mixture of spices, oils and food grains, musty and heady at the same
time. Sure, they had a good business going and the owner kept the assistants on
their toes, throughout the day, bellowing into the darker areas of the shop if
he suspected one or the other slacking, while patting his belly or alternately
scratching his back, absent-mindedly watching the passersby.
During a visit to the
Padinjare Kovilakom some years ago, in a search for details on my great
grandfather Vidwan Ettan Thampuran, the Zamorin 1912-1916, I happened to meet
(late) Mr Virarayan (Rajettan), a member of the Padinjare Kovilakom matrilineal
family. He gave me a copy of a book authored by P Kunjikrishna Menon, detailing
the procession and investiture ceremonies of the Zamorin, a book where the
author thanks to my great grandfather, for support & inputs. The book itself
covers multiple subjects through short essays and one of them happened to be
the history of the Moothans. I had misplaced the copy during my many moves
across the world but located it recently. So, without much ado, let me start with
the legend behind the Moothan migration.
The king asked the
minister to bring his daughter to him, but the minister demurred, stating that
it was not in line with the community norms to bring an unmarried girl to the
court. The furious king threatened to banish him and the proud minister stated
that he would in such a case prefer to leave the kingdom. The community
understanding that they were all doomed, agreed to follow the said minister who
decided to move westwards to the Cheranadu, crossing the ghats at the Palghat
gap. Per the legend they arrived in nine groups over a period of time. The
first set comprised people from the ancient Chola period towns of Eralapuram,
Adityapuram, Paschimapuram and Ramapuram. As is the practice of many
communities, they brought along their kula devatha (reigning titular deity) the
Bhagavathy and their learned guru Shiva acharya, as well as a good amount of
wealth.
The migrants, as it
appears, wanted to settle down wisely, in a land where honesty, peace and law
prevailed. So, they decided to test the regional Rajas by offering them a
copper vessel filled with gold dust but topped off with sugar, in exchange for
an abode. They did this in a peculiar fashion, sitting down, somewhat
arrogantly, instead of standing or bowing down with covered mouths, as was the
practice in Cheranad. Most kings refused to accede to their request and sent
them away, seeing their impertinence and the fact that the pot had just some
sugar, not bothering to check any further. They arrived finally at Malabar and
met the Zamorin. As they did elsewhere, they came in and sat before the
Zamorin, something he found quite unusual. Calling the Mangattachan (his senior
minister) they inspected the pot and discovered that the pot did contain gold,
not just sugar. He accepted the gift, set it down, but still curious about their
practice of sitting down, asked the two representatives to come back the next
day.
They came in the next day,
and sat down as usual, but the Zamorin sent word that they should return the following
day as he was ill. On the third day the Zamorin asked the Mangattachan, his
minister, to douse the location where they usually sat, with water. The
visitors arrived, and without hesitation, lay their upper garments on the wet
surface, to sit down. The Zamorin understood then that the two were not
impertinent, but were just following a practice they always followed, from
whence they came. He had a long chat with them thereafter, listening to their
story and agreed to provide them not only the land and assistance for
resettlement, permission to build temples and homesteads, but also security with
a force of 10,000 Nairs.
The Ramapuram group
settled at Mangot and installed the Bhagavathi in a temple there (Mangottu Kavu
at Athipotta, in Alathur, Palghat). These Ramapuram traders comprised the
Mangotkoottil Chettys and Nalonnukoottil Chettys and the prominent family heads
are titled Manna- diyars of the North and South Mannam (like in Kuzhal Mannam).
The Eralanad group settled
in Tiruvazhiyode. Curiously the girl (the minister’s daughter) with the great
powers, vanished the very next day, but an apparition of a Bhagavathy is seen
soon after, following which the members constructed a Bhagavathy temple in her
honor. This is the virgin goddess (Kanyaka Bhagavathy) at the Thiruvarakkal
Bhagavathy temple. The group itself split into the Eastern and Western factions
of the Cherupurathu Chettys. The Eastern faction comprises the Shankarath,
Mannath, Mangalath, Vattavankunnath, Etipath, Pallithodath, and Aramballi
families. The Western faction comprises the Chokath, Chilambath, Chassedath and
Pambath families.
Similarly, the Adityapura
group went to Vayilamkunnath, settled down and constructed their Bhagavathy
temple, and finally the Paschimapura group settled down in Thatchanattukara.
After all of them had settled down, the senior members together with their guru
the Shiva Acahrya, met and paid their obeisance to the Zamorin. According to
the practice in Malabar, these traders were then instructed to remove their
sacred thread (punool) and shave off their rear tufts of hair and to start
sporting front tufts as worn in Malabar. The traders remonstrated against the
removal of the sacred thread to which the Zamorin agreed (wearing it during
important occasions I presume), and also provided the groups with supporting artisans
such as carpenters, goldsmiths, washermen etc. They adopted matrilineal
practices too, in due course. The groups over time split into subgroups of Moothar
and Tharakans. Whenever the Zamorins representatives traveled
(Kottichezhunellath) to survey their domains, they called on some of these
locations and participated in pompous reception ceremonies. So much from the
Zamorin Chronicles.
Another source mentions that the Pathukudi branch traces its origin to the Perumkudi overseas trading Vaishyas among the Ippar, Kavippar & Perumkudi traders of Poompuhar. The story of the migration is much the same as we read before, only a bit more colorful, eventually ending up as asylees under the Zamorin. In another web source, the minister’s daughter requests a 41-day abstinence period before the wedding, allowing the Vaishyas to plan their departure to Cheranad. She also arranges for a girl named Vanaja to immolate herself (in her place) so that the group can inform the king that the minister’s daughter is dead, and close the case.
The entire epoch is also connected to Kannagi by other sources, though the timeline takes the migration back quite a few centuries. The legend is narrated as follows, quoting Madhava Menon - In a Sanskritized version of the same legend, Kannika is the daughter of Daksha, and the wife of Siva, who had visited her father in violation of the warning of her husband. For this transgression, she had been cursed to take three incarnations as a woman. The first was as Auvayar, who became a widow while still remaining a virgin, and devoted the rest of her life to the worship of Murugan. The second was as Kannaki (Kannika as pronounced by Muthan), the heroine of Cilappatikaram - they believe that she had remained a virgin as her husband had been fully taken up making love to Madhavi the courtesan. According to this version the Muthan had migrated to Kerala along with her, when she had wandered distraught after burning Madhurai in the tragic aftermath of the victimization of her husband. The Muthans have a temple dedicated to her at Palakkad.The Tharakan version agrees with these main details, but they believe their ancestors had accompanied Kannaki from Tanjavur onwards. The Gupta version is that Dakshayini was incarnated for the third time as Kannika, their own specific deity, and the daughter of the minister who had fled from the attentions of the Chola prince. They have several temples in her honour, but they enshrine her in the form, and the modes of worship are identical with those prescribed in Kerala for the worship of the mother-Goddess Bhadrakali.
From the Handbook of Kerala (Madhava Menon) and research conducted by PRG Mathur, we can glean the following additional aspects. The community prefers to term themselves as Arya Vaishyas with multiple subdivisions. Guptans, the most Sanskitized and perhaps the earliest migrants can be found at Ottapalam, Mannarghat and Perinthalmanna. Moothan or Tharakan, the largest majority can be found in Palghat and Alathur, whereas the most affluent, being the Mannadiyars can be found at Chitoor, Koduvayur and other parts of Palghat. It appears also that some of the learned Moothans use the Ezhuthacchan title. Always in a tussle to climb up the social caste ladder, even though they were considered lower by Nairs, the Moothans termed themselves Vaishyas (without the sacred thread) and therefore superior. The term Moothan (Muttavan – Elder) itself is explained as a title given to their leader by the Zamorin, but the Tarakan perceives himself superior to the Moothan, eventually becoming a Nair, according to Thurston. The Moothans and Mannadiars maintain Tamil observances whereas the Guptans are more inclined towards Brahmanical forms.
As we can summarize, the groups branched into three distinct subgroups, the Guptans, the Mannadiyars and the Moothans. The Mannadiars were considerably richer, and some of them changed their caste names to Nairs, while some in Tattamangalam termed themselves Menon stating that they were conferred the title by the Cochin Raja. The teachers among them, especially in the Valluvanad region (the Zamorin’s domain) who learned Sanskrit, called themselves Ezhuthatchans. According to the oral testimony of one such learned person in Kadambazhipuram (near Cherplasseri) a former Moothan approached Punnassery Nambi at Pattambi to learn Sanskrit, who after ascertaining that they were Vaishyas suggested the caste subgroup name of Guptan. Thus, came about the learned and Sanskritized Guptan community, who kept to themselves (not intermarrying with Moothans and Mannadiars) termed themselves Vaishyas and wore a sacred thread during important ceremonies. The Guptans took to Astrology, Tantrism and Ayurveda.
The Moothans and Mannadiars stuck to trade and the community spoke in a dialect - a mixture of Tamil and Malayalam, and in the past wrote their accounts in Tamil. According to Madhava Menon. The Moothans are segmented into five exogamous clans whereas the Guptans adopt lineage names. The Moothan community in Palghat has over 45,000 members these days and still derives much of their revenue from domestic trade, hardly venturing beyond Indian borders.
We get the following additional inputs from Thurston - It is recorded, in the Madras Census Report, 1891, under the conjoint heading Muttan and Tarakan, that “these two are allied castes, but the latter would consider it a disgrace to acknowledge any affinity with the former. Tarakan literally means a broker. Dr. Gundert says that these were originally warehouse-keepers at Palghat. There is considerable antagonism between the Palghat and Walavanad sections of the caste.
He adds a note explaining the difference between Taragan and Tarakan - Another caste of traders, which has now been practically incorporated in the Nayar body, is the class known as Taragans (literally, brokers) found in Palghat and Walavanad, some of whom have considerable wealth and high social position. The Taragans of Angadippuram and the surrounding neighborhood claim to be immigrants from Travancore, and to be descendants of Ettuvittil Pillamar of Quilon, who are high caste Nayars. They can marry Kiriyattil women, and their women occasionally have sambandham with Samantan Rajas. The Palghat Taragans on the other hand can marry only in their caste.” I believe however that the Taragan’s responsibility was tax collection for the Raja and not working as brokers or agents, and later intermingled with Nairs. The Moothan womenfolk are called Chettichis.
One other interesting aspect is that the Chetty womenfolk of Palghat make the chuttu or kai murukkus which we can only find in Palghat. It is perhaps my favorite among savories and something I always remember to carry back to the US, after visiting Palghat. We can also see that most metalware shops in Palghat are owned by Mannadiars.
Now let us get some inputs from the Tamil side of the ghats, just across the Palghat gap. Firstly, we can take note that the aforementioned Sivacharya hailed from the Perur madom near Coimbatore, indicating that most of the clan probably lived in Kongunadu and moved later to Cheranadu. The Moothans who approached the Zamorin must have done so in the 16th or 17th century when the Zamorin had become the suzerain, after defeating the Valluva Konathiri and usurping the Mamankam rights. Kongu chronicles mention a robust trade between Kongunad and Cheranad, so also the existence of a number of Vellala families in the Palghat area. We discussed this briefly while talking about the Kongan Pada.
Epigraphist Pulavar Dr. S.
Raju mentions a Kongu Chola inscription, more than 1,000 years old, which talks
of Vellalan Kumaran Kumaranaana Dhananjaya Pallavaraiayan, living in Palghat.
He adds - One story that repeats in literature and copper plates is that of
the marriage of a Chola princess into the Chera royal family, and the
subsequent movement of 8,000 Kongu Vellalas to Chera Nadu. ‘Alagumalai
Kuravanji’ talks of these Vellalas,” says Raju. “According to Mezhi Vilakkam,
the Vellalas had landed rights (kani urimai) in various locales in Cheranadu.
Kongu Vellalas arrived in Palghat from Kangeyam, Karur, Kaadiyur, Sanguppalayam
(Sankarandampalayam) and Pazhaiayakottai. A copper plate in the Salem archives,
registers an agreement among several members of the Kongu Vellala and Kongu
Mannadiyar Communities and belonging to the Porulandaikulam, living in Kilkarai
Pundurai nadu, granting lands and perquisites to Ponnallippulandran of
Dharmapuram. This of course does not align with the previously mentioned
legends or what the community states.
Raju also connects the
Mannadiyars to Kongunadu (Courtesy - Hindu article April 30th, 2020
Suganthy Krishnamachari) - Mannadiyar is a title, which the Angarath and
Vadaseri families of Kerala have. William Logan, in his Malabar Manual, says
that the Mannadiyars were a caste of Vellalars from Kangeyam, in Coimbatore
province, who had settled in Palakkad. Mandradi is a title held by many Kongu
Vellala families which became Mannadi in Malayalam. According to him, Vadaseri
Mannadiyars have the privilege of opening the Western entrance to the Perur
temple, near Coimbatore, because they once owned all the land to the West of
the temple. They owned forests, running to thousands of acres in Kerala, from
where they used to supply wood for erecting pandals during the temple festival
in Perur. Mannadiyars were disciples of the Melmatam in Perur, to which many
Kongu Vellalas owe allegiance. When a Mannadiyar died, concluding rites after
14 days, were performed in Perur, on the banks of the Noyyal. Mannadiyar
families in Maruthur, Palakkad district, were familiar with Kamba Ramayanam.
Pavakoothu, based on the epic, is a 14-day festival in the Chunanghi Bhagavati
temple in Nallepilly.
MGR’s mother Satyabhama, according
to Raju, belonged to a family in Maruthur, who are referred to as Vadavanur
Vellalar in copper plates. To Gopala Menon and Satyabhama, was born the
renowned M.G. Ramachandran! Thus, MGR had a Kongu Vellala connection, according
to him. Ilankai Tamil Sangam (Sachi Sri Kantha) tells us that MGR did play the
Mannadiyar card when there was a furor about him being a Malayali. MGR is
recorded as stating - My ancestors belonged to Kongu Nadu region and were
from Mandradiar group. Their ancestral town was Pollachi. Those who were called
Mandradiar in Pollachi, were called ‘Mannadiar’ (in corrupted form) in
Palakkadu region…. It’s because of this, when someone calls me as a Malayalee,
I become angry. These details were told by my mother when I was young’. I
will not get into further details here or agree fully with this, as I did some
research into this aspect and will write about it another day, in more detail.
We note that these traders
were also associated with the weaving trade, from inscriptions found near
Tirupur. A locality within Tirupur named Sarkar Periyapalayam has a temple
named Sukreeswarar Kovil or Kurukku Thali. Meenakshi Sundaram (New Indian
Express 09-08-15) tells us the following - Throwing light on the trade
activities of a large merchant guild at Sarkar Periyapalayam, whose name is
mentioned as Mukundhanur in an epigraph, an inscription spread on the entire
large wall of the shrine unfolds how the traders planned the expenses to
conduct the temple festival Vaikasi Thiruvizha to worship the deity
Kurakkuthali Nayanar. Interestingly, expressing their consent, as many as 64
merchants have ‘signed’ their names on the inscription. While four of them have
given their signatures in the ancient Vatezhuthu (Rounded script) the rest have
done it in Tamil script. The four merchants had hailed from ‘Malaimandalam’
which refers to present-day Kerala.
He adds - Taking a
history enthusiast to the world of trade in ancient times, the inscription
details the names of different commodities and the customs duty on their
exports and imports. Besides, the it also informs the names of the merchants
with their native towns as Urayurudayaan Periyyayya Devan, Pandimandalathu
Sundarapandiyapurathu Siriyapillai, Eralapurathu Vyapari Koothan Kannan and so
on. Pointing out the mention of the place ‘Eralapuram’ in the inscription, Mr Poongundran,
the former, Assistant director, Tamil Nadu Archeology Department informs us it
is none other than today’s Ernakulam in Kerala!
Now that is probably confusing,
the Eralapuram so mentioned was the location from where the traders migrated
out of, somewhere near PoomPuhar. Eralanadu is also Eranad where the
Nediyiruppu swaroopam originated from. These Eralapuram migrants settled at
Thiruvazhiyode, and perhaps re-termed themselves as Eralnadu or Eralapuram
(new) traders, after resettling in the Malayalam regions and changing their
written script to Vattezhuthu. But the Chola period locales of Eralapuram,
Adityapuram, Paschimapuram and Ramapuram are yet to be pinpointed. I will add a
clarifying note if I get more details.
With this, I think I have
collated most of the available information on the Moothan community and
arranged them in a somewhat cohesive fashion. Hopefully, it will be of some help
to anybody searching for their roots.
References
Ariyittuvalcayum
Kotticcelunnallattum (1910) – By P Kunji Krishna Menon
Handbook of Kerala – Vol 2
– T Madhava Menon (with Moothan inputs by PRG Mathur)
Castes and Tribes of
Southern India. Vol. 4 of 7 by Edgar Thurston
7 comments:
This is from Chennai. A very big applause for your efforts for such cumulative
,deep & comprehensive look through. I can easily relate all the stuff which you have summarized here which reminds me of and are perfectly in line with what I heard from my ancestors ( Grandma & grandpa ) during my childhood vacation days in Palakkad. Yes & Of course, There is nothing to do with caste in these modern days but knowing one's root is something interesting and gives such a nostalgic feel when we revisit those places again.....
cofused about the Mangod temple ,there is another Mangod bhagavathi temple at Mangod near vellinezhi in palakad district,which is near to above said Vayillyamkunnu bhagavathi and Thiruvarakkal bhagavathi temple .so kindly please clarify the data .
little confused about data of Mangod bhagavathi temple history because there is another Mangod bhagavathi temple in Mangod panchayath in cherppulasseri ,which is nearer to Vayillyamkunnu bhagavathi temple and Thiruvarakkal bhagavathy .so please clarify the data .
please clarify the data of Mangod bhagavathy temple ,There is another Mangod bhagavathi at Mangod near cherppulasseri .which is the temple nearer to Vayillyamkunnu and Thiruvarakkal Temples.
There are 2 Mannadiyar 1 nair and other moothan , MGR belong to the 1st
There are 2 manadiyar 1 nair and moothan MGR belong to the 1sr
wow!,....thoroughly researched like all your other articles!..the THarakan title in south central kerala is among christians!....but in palakkad it is among the moothans,asI understand broadly the tharakans,mannadiars ,guptans are all vaishyas....and intermarriage with nairs is fairly common...although caste prejudices still rule!..I know an arya vaishya lady who said nairs were shudras and hence beneath them in the caste hierarchy...!!!!....you mentioned the guptans following brahminical /sanskritic traditions whereas the mannadiars and tharakans lean towards tamil tradition....could these Guptans be derived from the large baniya caste of north india- gupta,agarwal etc??.....there was a writer called guptan nair..!..I wonder whether he was from this community?
regards!
Post a Comment