The Samiri and Taj-al Din at Dhofar
Posted by Labels: Dhofar, Malabar Pre 15th Century, Malabar traditions, Malabar Various, Taj Al DinContinuing with the Cheraman Perumal myths…
The Keralolpathi, the Zainuddin Makkhdum’s call for a jihad
against the accursed Franks, the Fath ul mubiyn, they all mention of a King
from the Hind who traveled to Mecca and died on the way back, at Dhofar. We
talked earlier about the Cheraman Perumal legends, the Perumal and the pickle
and so on, but with additional information at hand, I would like to revisit the
topic and also cover the interconnected story of the al-Samiri and Taj-al din
tomb’s at Dhofar in Oman.
In an area called Dhofar is buried a person, a king actually who has been venerated over centuries by the locals there. His name is purported to be Abdul Rahiman Samiri. An inscription explained that this person reached Dhofar in 212 and died there in 216 (821-831 AD). Now comes the question, who could this gent be? He has been connected to the Cheraman Perumal who converted and went to Mecca and also one of the earlier Zamorins of Calicut. We do know that the Samuthiripad or Samoothiri, a term which morphed to Samorin or Zamorin dates to the 13th century. During the 821 period or even later to 814 as Logan implies, we had a Eranadu Utyavar, not a Zamorin. But legends mention that this was a king from Malabar. Let’s try to investigate a bit to try and find out if we can get to the bottom of this myth.
First let’s take a relook at the Cheraman Perumal epoch. A
detailed analysis by the eminent historian MGS Narayanan reveals that the
confusion is caused by the usage of a generic name Cheraman Perumal. What he
concludes is that Rama Kulashekara Perumal was the one who gifted the royal
sword and the area with just a thicket of bushes, namely Koilkode to the
Nediyirippu or Ernad Utayvar, following their protracted fight with the Pandi
Raja Jatavarman who had tried to invade his territory. It was in this battle
that the two Ernad youths Manichan and Vikraman lent heroic support and staved
off defeat. All this is now considered to have happened around 1122 AD or a
little beyond. At this point of time, Rama Kulashekara abdicates and travels to
Mecca. Malik Dinar arrives and the first ten mosques of Malabar are
constructed. The inscription at the Madayi mosque is dated to 1124 AD (518H)
and this thus fits into the timeline and coincides with the tenures of the
other Rajas (Tulunad, Kolathunad, Venad) mentioned in the Keralolpathi.
Other pointers appear to confirm the Perumal story,
especially the aspect relating to the Perumal’s wrongful execution of the
Padamel Nayar after being misled by his queen. As it appears, the Perumal
appealed to various Sastri’s after realizing his mistake and they confirm to
him that there is no possibility for any kind of expiation, other than leaving
his religious faith and seeking refuge elsewhere. This is how and why he
excommunicated himself and abdicated, embraced Islam and decided to travel to
Mecca. With that event, the Chera empire collapsed, Brahminical oligarchy and
Swaroopams emerged, Islam arrived in Malabar and the Perumal slipped away. The
Keralolpathi, biased toward the Namputhiri’s states that the Perumal besieged
with guilt and anxiety to please the Brahmins, faced with dissenting or irate
feudatories, abdicated and handed overall control to the feudatories who
finally became independent. So, we can now surmise that it was potentially a
Chera Perumal Ravi Kulashekara who abdicated and sailed away.
Per the Keralolpathi English translation, the story goes
thus. Listen to the antiquary related by the Muslims: Cheraman Perumal
secretly embarked in a ship from Kodungallur Port; reaching the anchorage at
Koilandi Kollam, he stayed for a day; the next day, reached Dharmapattanam, and
stayed three days, and entrusted the protection of the palace there to the
Tamutiri; embarking again, he had to face attacks from several pirates from
Kodungallur and other places, and fight many battles; he managed to land at the
harbour at Sehar Muklah. At that time, Muhammad Nabi was staying at Jiddah;
Perumal met the Prophet there, got converted, and was renamed Tajuddin. He
married Rajiyath, the sister of Malik Habib ud din, the king of Arabia, and
stayed for 5 years. The above said king, his 15 children, and the Perumal went
to Sehar Muklah, and had constructed a big palace and mosque there. While
residing at peace there, and preparing to return to Malayalam in order to
spread the religion, he was rendered ill with the cold disease (tuberculosis?)
He despatched his sons with letters to the kings of Malayalam, and died. He was
buried in the mosque that he himself had constructed. The king took the letters
and the seal of the Perumal, and embarking in two ships with his wives and
children, sailed off; one of the ships arrived at the anchorage off Madhura.
The fourth son, Takayuddin and other landed, and settled down, after
constructing a mosque. The other ship reached Kodungallur, and with the
permission of the king, a mosque was constructed. Muhammad became the Quadi and
stayed there….
Taj-Al- DIn’s story (Translation extracts
acknowledgment: Quissa Shakravarti Farmad – Scott Kugle, Roxani Eleni
Margariti)
The Quissa Shakravarti Farmad (Poem or Kissa on the Cheraman
Perumal) in the British Library has been studied by a number of scholars and
the Part 3 generally reads as follows. Qissat Shakarwati represents a tradition
that has been popular among the Mapillas and it figures prominently in their
folk poetry.
The ruler sailed from the aforementioned port and arrived
at the port of Fandarayna and stayed there for one day and one night. Then they
sailed from there to the port of Darmafattan and stayed there for three days.
From there they headed to Shiḥr. On the high seas, they spied the boats of
pirates that were circling their ship. The pirates hurled stones and spewed
Greek fire and shot arrows, but, by the blessing of the Prophet, none of these
struck their bodies. All the soldiers who were protecting the ship said to one
another, “Didn’t you see a host of people all around our ship with radiant
faces and white robes, who pointed with the sleeves of their robes toward the
pirates, who were broken up and routed and sunk, and they began to quarrel and
fight among themselves? When they were made victorious over the pirates, they
were overjoyed and continued their journey. They arrived at their chosen port
of Shiḥr and disembarked.
They stayed there for ten days. They heard that the
Prophet was at Jeddah, near Mecca. So, the ruler and his companions joined a
caravan of merchants. When they arrived near Jeddah, the Prophet had already
heard news of their coming and went out with his Companions to greet them……….
Then the Prophet asked him, “What is your name?” He
replied, “I am Shakarwatī Farmāḍ.” At that moment, the Prophet gave him a new
name and called the ruler Tāj al-Dīn al-Hindī al-Malabārī (“Crown of the
Religion, the Indian and Malabari”)……
News of this reached Ḥabīb b. Mālik and Mālik b. Dīnār,
his brother by the same mother. They brought their children and companions and
soldiers and, along with all the Quraysh, came to visit the Indian ruler. There
developed a great love between the ruler of India and Ḥabīb b. Mālik and his
brother Sharaf b. Mālik and his brother [sic] and his children. Together, they
pledged to travel in the company of the ruler of India back to India. The ruler
of India, Tāj al-Dīn, married the sister of Mālik b. Dīnār, who was named
Rājiya. He stayed with the prophet Muḥammad and his companions and the
companions of Ḥabīb b. Mālik for five years. Then the time came for their
travel back to India in order to build mosques, spread Islam, and encourage
people to follow the Prophet and his Companions….
Then the Prophet, his companions, Ḥabīb b. Mālik, and
some of the army returned after the Prophet had given detailed parting advice
to the ruler and his companions. He accepted the parting advice and sailed from
there and arrived at the teeming port of Aden. He made Ḥabīb b. Mālik b. Ḥabīb
the ruler of Aden. Then he sailed from there to the port of Shiḥr. They wanted
to populate and settle the port towns of Shiḥr and Ẓafār and Somnath
(al-Samanāt) and Oman and Qalḥāt. They settled these places and built in them
congregational mosques and delivered sermons in them. The Muslims gained moral
strength in these regions.
They stopped in Shiḥr in order to provision the ship to
travel toward India. While this was being done, the Indian ruler fell ill. His
illness worsened day by day. The ruler realized that he could not get back to
India, so he gave parting advice to his companions. These were Sharaf b. Mālik
and Mālik b. Dīnār and Ibn Mālik b. Ḥabīb and their children who were mentioned
above. He told them, “You all should not delay your journey to India after I’ve
passed away!” They answered him together, “But we will be strangers in your
realm, and we desired to go to India only to accompany you! How can we proceed
without you?” The ruler of India thought deeply for a moment. Then he wrote a
letter for them in the script of India, and he wrote down the names of the
rulers of India, their realms, capitals, treasuries, relatives, armies, and all
that they would need of the rules and customs of India. He specified that they
should disembark at the port of Kodungallor, which was the center of his rule,
or at the ports of Dharmafattan or Fandarayna or Kollam. He said, “Do not
mention to anyone how ill I am, for, if it is known that I have died, it means
death for all the people of India. It is just as our Prophet has said: ‘The
believer is alive in both worlds—indeed he simply moves from one world to the
next.” Indeed, on this topic there are many lively stories.
In the end, the ruler of India died in this ephemeral
world and passed on to the eternal world, on Monday night, 1st Muḥarram.
Then they washed his body and wrapped it in his shroud and buried it with pomp
and respect and fanfare.
For his funeral a huge crowd gathered in a wide-open
ground—may God keep his remains wholesome and give him Paradise as a final
resting place. On the day the Prophet emigrated (hijra) [31] from Mecca to
Medina he said: “This ruler of India, the departed and forgiven one, may God
support him with His Mercy and cause him to inhabit his paradise.”
Did Taj-al Din die in Shihir, in Yemen or did he move from
there to Dhofar in Oman? After his death he was buried, near either the
Hadramawt port of Shihr, or in neighboring Zafâr, but historians are not sure.
Let’s now go and check out the shrine in Dhofar, in Oman.
For that we have to check the travel accounts of SB Miles, who visited the
shrine in 1884. Proceeding westward along the maritime plain to Bundar
Raysoot we arrive first at Dareez, once the capital of the Katheeris, after
which is Robat, near which is the shrine of the Hindoo Raja of Cranganore known
as Al-Samiri, and the ruins of Al-Balad.
I interviewed here the old Kadhi, Seyyid Ahmed, who gave
me some information about the Garas and about the Samiri. He informed me that
the Samiri was a converted Kafir and it was through his sanctity Dhofar was
first blessed with rain; before this time the water of heaven had never fallen.
His tomb was now a ziarat or shrine, and visited by all sorts and conditions of
men, and his name was included with the other Ameers, Anbias and Ulemas, and
was prayed to whenever rain was required by the people of the district.
The tomb of the Al-Samiri lies about half a mile from the
sea and is enclosed by an unroofed wall of mud and stones twenty-five feet by
ten, the grave being eighteen feet by four, lying north and south, with a
broken headstone of black basalt or limestone. The inscription is imperfect,
the lower part, bearing the date, has disappeared, while at the foot of the
tomb is a small cavity for holding oil, the lamp being kept lighted throughout
the year by the devotees. The roof of the building collapsed many years ago,
but last year a slave named Saeed saw the saint in a dream and was warned that
if the tomb was left exposed to the sun the whole district would be parched for
want of rain; a subscription was therefore raised and some repairs were
effected, but sufficient funds to renew the roof were not available.
Now let us get back to the aspect of figuring out the
identity of the person who traveled to Mecca and met the prophet. It obviously
cannot be the Rama Kulashekara due to the dates. Was it in the 12th century
as concluded by recent historians or much earlier in the prophet’s time, i.e.
when he was 57 years old, i.e. approx 627CE, or was it in the 9th century?
It becomes clear that we cannot determine the name of the Perumal or Raja who
went to Mecca in 627 CE if indeed there was one, nor correlate anything to the
dating of 831 CE. Moreover, the Tāj al-Dīn al-Hindī al-Malabārī, has changed to
Abdul Rahman Al-Samiri in Omani accounts which do not make sense, especially so
since the prophet himself had given him that honorable name!
William Logan replying a reader in the Indian antiquary
March 1882 - Can you or any of your readers verify the following facts
which I have on the authority of an Arab living on the outskirts of Zafhar on
the Arabian Coast? Logan replied - At Zafhar lies buried one Abdul Rahiman
Samiri, a king of Malabar. The inscription on his tombstone says he arrived at
that place A. H.212, and died there, A. H. 216. The tomb is regarded with much
veneration as that of a Hindu (Samiri= Samaritan=worshipper of the calf), king
of Malabar, who became a convert to Islam. If the dates are correct, then –
(a) This is almost certainly the tomb of the Kodungallur
(Cranganore) king mentioned in the Tahafat-ul Mujdhidin, the author of which
placed that king’s conversion about A. H. 200.
(b) The origin of the Kollam era of the Malabar Coast is
accounted for in the most natural way if it dated from the traditional Cheruman
Perumal’s setting out for Arabia. The interval between A. D. 824 and his
arrival at Zafhar (A. D.827) is probably accounted for in the Tahafat-ul
Mujdhidin, which says he remained a considerable time at Shahr where he first
of all landed.
It seems the Mukri of the mosque adjacent to the tomb
came to Malabar some fifteen years ago soliciting subscriptions for repairing
the tomb and mosque. Calicut, 6th March 1882. WL
Now conjecture has it that the Al Samiri buried in Dhofar
was a king of Malabar. The use of Al Samiri in a name just means Hindu
ox-worshipper to the Arabs, as we discussed earlier in the Zamorin Etymology
article. Confounding the situation even further is a mention by the Naiaitas
(Nawait’s) - the sailors of Gujarat that they had proselytized a Zamorin of
Malabar and that this is the Abdurahman Samiri.
So, we now have a king or kings who converted and traveled
West in 627 CE, 825 CE, and in 1122CE. To check which is more likely, one can
also look at the mosques established in the wake of the Arabs who came
thereafter with the King’s blessing. The Cheraman mosque as it is popularly
known was apparently established in 629-30CE, but there is no proof to that,
while the three larger mosques in Calicut date to the 14th-15th century. The
Kissa mentions that the Kodungallur mosque was built in 21AH (642-643CE),
Kollam, Chaliyam, Bhatkal, Madayi, Pantalayani, Ezhimala, Kasargode, Mangalore
and Dharmapattanam mosques were built next, all dating to the 640-650 CE time
frame, but we have no inscriptions or proof for the dating. Pantalayani did
have tombstones dating back to 782 CE. The Terisapalli copper plates suggest
Muslim settlers in the 9th century, so also the conclusion by Zainuddin
Makhdum. The Madayi mosque inscription supports the 12th-century date. So that
avenue of study is also inconclusive and in conflict with the Kissa.
At Zaphar, we understand that there are two tombs, one of the al-Samiri from Malabar and another purportedly that of Taj-aldin. My guess is that Al Samiri was a man, perhaps a noble from the Malabar west coast who converted and settled in Dhofar. As a Hindu, he was termed Al Samiri and this is certainly not the Perumal who carried the name Tajuddin. The Samiri which meant ox-worshipper simply got confused with Zamorin by the English. There are no indications from the study of Zamorins that one of them abdicated, but one thing seems clear, we have two different people and two different tombs in Salalah.
Searching for the Taj al-din tomb, I read of a Cheraman Perumal Maqam in Salalah which is an open tomb, strange considering that Prophet had considered him quite dear! I came across two video’s showing Taj al-din’s tomb at Salalah, see videos 1 and 2 linked.As the two stories and persons seem to be different, so also
the tombs, we have to check further - any further information or clarification
from readers are appreciated.
Friedmann’s conclusion is therefore apt at this point - It
is difficult to say what historical facts are in the background of Qissat
Shakarwati (or for that matter Abdurahman Al-Samiri). But even if hard facts
are difficult to come by, the story is remarkably valuable as an expression of
the ethos of the Mapilla community.
We will not leave Dhofar as yet, for it was host to yet
another person from Malabar, the Sayyid Fadhl from HV Conolly’s times. I will
get to his fascinating story, soon.
References
Manavikrama alias Punturakkon of Eranad, A new name in the
twilight of the Chera kingdom in Kerala – MGS Narayanan
Keralolpathi – Gundert, En Trans - T Madhava Menon
Death and Burial in Arabia and Beyond Multidisciplinary
perspectives – Ed Lloyd Weeks (Shrines in Dhofar - Lynne S. Newton)
The Countries and Tribes of The Persian Gulf Volume 2 - Samuel Barrett Miles
Narrating Community: the Qiṣṣat Shakarwatī Farmāḍ and Accounts of Origin in Kerala and around the Indian Ocean - Scott Kugle, Roxani Eleni Margariti
Qissat Shakarwati Farmad - A tradition concerning the
introduction of Islam to Malabar -Y. Friedmann
Note: Zahfar and Dhofar are the same, and the location of
the Samiri shrine is in the Salalah area of Oman.
For a description of the Samiri tomb check these out - One and Two
Pics - Google images, thanks to the owners/uploaders
2 comments:
Exceptional work. Please write a book about all these. It will help the future generations.
Thanks Manu,
I have to start pulling together some compliations..
Post a Comment